"What shall we then say that Abraham our
father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? for if Abraham were justified
by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. For what saith the
Scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But
to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his
faith is counted for righteousness. Even as David also describeth the
blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,
saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are
covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin."
PAUL never forgets, in the course of this argument, that he is
addressing himself to Jews; and, bred as he was in all their prejudices, he
evinces a strong and a ready sense of the antipathies, that he would ever and
anon be stirring up in their minds, by the doctrine on which he expatiated. He
knew how much they all gloried in Abraham and how natural it was for them
therefore to feel that Abraham had something to glory of in himself; and, as he
urged that faith which excludes boasting, the case of the patriarch occurred to
him; nor could he have selectcd a better than that of one so eminently the
favourite of God as he was, for illustrating the principle upon which God holds
out friendship and acceptance to mankind.
Ver. 1. The term flesh does
not stand related to the circumstance of Abraham being our father. It does not
mean what is it that Abraham, our father by earthly descent, hath found - but
what is it that Abraham our father hath found by his natural or external
performances. Whatever can be done by the powers of nature, can be done by the
flesh. The outward observances of Judaism can be so done; and thus the Mosaic
law is termed by Paul the law of a carnal commandment. In the question he puts
to the Galatians - " Having begun in the Spirit are ye now made perfect by the
flesh " he is expostulating with those who thought that the rite of
circumcision, one of the Jewish observances, was necessary to perfect their
acceptance with God. Paul professes of himself, that he gloried not in the
flesh; and, in enumerating the real sons which might have led him so to glory,
he refers, not merely to his descent, but to his circumcision, and to his
pharisaical zeal, and to his blamelessness in regard to the righteousness of
the law. Abraham had rites and performances laid on him, and he was punctual in
their observation; and the question is, What did Abraham procure by these
services?
Ver. 2. If by these services he was justified, he has whereof
to glory, whereof to boast himself. But no! his boasting too must be excluded.
He has nothing whereof to glory of before God.
Ver. 3. Genesis, xv, 6.
This is said of Abraham, previous, by several years, to the institution of the
great Jewish rite of circumcision. He was in favour with God, before this deed
of obedience. He was dealt with by God as a righteous person, before this work
of righteousness was done by him. God had declared Himself to be his reward;
and by his trust in this declaration, did be become entitled to the reward.
This conferred on it the character of a gift. Otherwise it would have been it
the payment of a debt, as of wages rendered for services performed.
Ver. 4. It would not have been regarded as a gratuitous thing but, a
thing due.
Ver. 5. Observe a few things here. The man who has obtained
justification may be looked upon as in possession of a title-deed, whieh
secures to him a right to God's favour. The question is, How comes he into
possession of this title-deed? Did he work for it, and thus receive it as a
return for his works? No, he did not work for it; and thus it is that
justification is to him who worketh not - that is, he did nothing antecedent to
his justification to bring this privilege down to him; and it is a
contradiction to allow that it is by doing anything subsequent to justification
that he secures this privilege, for it is secured already. He is now in
possession of it - He has not. to work for the purpose of obtaining what he
already has. Arid neither did he work for it at the time that he had it not. He
came to it not by doing but by behieving. His is like the case of a man getting
in a present the title to an estate. He did not work for it before it was
presented, and so get it as a reward. It was a gift. He does not work for it
after it is presented, for it is his already. But you must remark here - though
it is not in consideration of works done either before or after the grant that
the privilege was bestowed - yet that is not to say, but that the person so
privileged becomes a busy, diligent, ever-doing, and constantly-working man.
When it is said that the faith of him who worketh not is counted for
righteousness - it is meant, that he does not work for the purpose of obtaining
a right of acceptance, and that it is not upon the consideration of his works
that this right has been conferred upon him. But it is not meant that such a
person works not for any purpose at all. To recur to the case of him who has a
gratuitous estate conferred upon him, he neither worked for the estate before
he obtained it, nor for it after he has obtained it. But from the very moment
of his assured prospect of coming into the possession of it, may he have become
most zealously diligent in the business of preparing himself for the enjoyment
of all the advantages, and the discharge of all the obligations connected with
this property. He may have put himself under the tuition of him who perhaps at
one time possessed it, and knew it thoroughly, and could instruct him how to
make the most of it. He did not work for it; but now that he has got it he has
been set most busily a-working, though not for a right to the property, yet all
for matters connected with the property. He may forthwith enter on a very busy
process of education, to render him meet for the society of those with whom he
is now in kindred circumstances.
And thus with the Christian, who by
faith receives the gift of eternal life. It cannot be put down to the account
of works done, either before or after the deed of conveyance has passed into
his hands. But no sooner does he lay hold of the deed, than he begins, amid
that most strenuously, to qualify himself for the possession - to translate
himself into the kindred character of Heaven - to wean himself away from the
sin and the sordidness of a world, which he no longer regards as his
dwelling-place - and, with a foot which touches lightly that earth from which
he is to ascend so soon into the fields of eternal glory that are above him, to
aspire after the virtues which are current there; and, by an active cultivation
of his heart, labour to prepare himself for a station of happiness and honour
among the companies of the celestial. We would further have you to remark, that
you must beware of having any such view of faith, as will lead you to annex to
it the kind of merit or of claim or of glorying under the gospel, which are
annexed to works under the law. This in fact were just animating with a legal
spirit, the whole phraseology and doctrine of the gospel. It is God who
justifies. He drew up the title-deed, and He bestowed the title-deed. It is
ours, simply by laying hold of it. The donor who grants a worldly estate to his
friend, counts his friend to have right enough to the property by having
received it. God who offers us an inheritance of glory, counts us to have right
enough to the possession of it by our relying on the truth and the honesty of
the offer. Under the law, obedience would have been that personal thing in us
which stood connected with our right to eternal life. Under the gospel, faith
is that personal thing in us which stands connected with this right; but just
as the act of stretching forth his hand to the offered alms, is that personal
doing of the mendicant that stands connected with his possession of the money
received by him. Any other view of faith than that which excludes boasting,
must be altogether unscriptural; and will mislead the enquirer; and may involve
his mind in much darkness, and in very serious difficulties. Where is boasting
then It is excluded. By what law! of faith. It is of faith that it might be by
grace - not that it might be a thing of merit, but a thing of freeness - a
present. Ye are saved by grace through faith. Conceive it a question, whether a
dwelling house is enlightened by a candle from within, or by an open window.
The answer may justly enough be that it is by the window - and yet the window
does not enlighten the house. It is the sun which enlightens it. The window is
a mere opening for the transmission of that which is from without. Christ hath
wrought out a righteousness for us that is freely offered to us of God. By
faith we discern the reality of this offer; and all that it does is to strike
out, as it were, an avenue of conveyance, by which the righteousness of another
passes to us; and through faith are we saved by this righteousness.
Ver. 6 - 8. They are Jewish authorities which Paul makes use of, when
he wants to school down Jewish antipathies - thus meeting his countrymen on
their own ground; and never better pleased than when, on the maxim of all
things to all men, he can reconcile them to a doctrine which they hate, by
quoting in favour of it a testimony which they revere. Take sin in its most
comprehensive sense, as including in it both the sin of omission and the sin of
performance; and then the opposite to this, or sinlessness, will imply, not
only that there has been no performance of what is wrong, but no omission of
what is right. In this sense sinlessness is not a mere flea but is fully
equivalent to righteousness; and not to impute sin, is tantamount to the
imputation of righteousness. It is clear that the righteousness thus imputed,
which the Psalmist refers to, was a righteousness without works - that is,
without such works as could at all pretend to the character, or to any of the
claims of righteousness. For what were the works of those who had this
righteousness imputed to them? They were iniquities which had been forgiven,
and sins which had been covered.
There are certain technical terms in
theology which are used so currently, that they fail to impress their own
meaning on the thinking principle. The term "impute" is one of them. It may
hold forth a revelation of its plain sense to you - when it is barely mentioned
that the term impute in the 6th verse, is the same in the original with what is
employed in that verse of Philemon where Paul says, "If he hath wronged thee,
or oweth thee ought, put that on mine account." To impute righteousness to a
man without works, is simply to put righteousness down to his account - though
he has not performed tho works of righteousness.
The following is the
paraphrase of the passage.
"What shall we make then of our father
Abraham; and how shall we estimate the amount of what he procured by those
works of obedience which he rendered, and are still required of us by a law
that lays such things upon us as we are naturally able to perform For if
Abraham did procure justification to himself by these works, he hath something
to glory of - though we have just now affirmed that all glorying is excluded.
Our affirmation nevertheless stands good, for he hath nothing to glory of
before God. And what saith the Scripture about this Not that Abraham obeyed,
and his obedience was counted; but Abraham believed God, and his belief was
counted unto him for righteousness. Now to him that workcth and getteth reward
for it, reward is not a favour ; but the payment of what is due. But it is to
him who worketh not for a right to acceptance, but believeth on Him who
offereth this acceptance and justifieth the ungodly, that his faith is counted
for righteousness. Even as David also describeth the blessedness of him to whom
God reckoneth a righteousness without works - saying, blessed are they whose
iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are so hidden from remembrance, that
they are no longer mentioned. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not
reckon the guilt of his sin." The first lesson we draw from
this passage is one which we have often urged in your hearing; but aware of the
difference that there is between the work of urging a principle for the moral
purpose of influencing the heart, and the work of urging a principle for the
purpose of informing and rectifymg the judgment - we do not feel it so much a
vain repetition to come over and over the same thing, for the one of these
purposes, as for the other of them. To say what is thoroughly apprehended
already, and that for the purpose of informing the mind, were tiresome and
inapplicable ; but to say what, when present to the view of the understanding,
It is fitted to work a spiritual impression, is said for the purpose of
stirring up the mind. And this may be done, not in the way of presenting it
with novelties; but the mind may be so stirred tip in the way of remembrance.
And this, by the way, suggests to us a very useful test of distinction, between
one set of hearers and another, which may be turned by you all into a matter of
self-application. The hearer, whose main relish it is to regale his intellect,
will, in his appetite for what is original and argumentative and variegated,
nauseate, as tasteless and fatiguing, the constant recurrence of the few but
all-impressive simplicities of the gospel. The hearer, whose ruling desire it
is to refresh and to edify the spiritual life, will no more feel distaste to
the nourishment that he has already taken in for the food of the soul, than to
the nourishment that he has already and often taken in for the food of the
body. The desire for the sincere milk of the word, is not desire for amusement
that he may gratify a thirst for speculation - but a desire for aliment, that
he may grow thereby. And thus it is, that what may be felt as unsufferable
sameness by him who roams with delight from one prospect and one eminence to
another in the scholarship of Christianity, may in fact be the staple commodity
of a daily and most wholesome ministration to him who, seeking like Paul for
the practical objects of an acceptance and a righteousness within God, like him
counts all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of the Saviour;
and like Him is deternuined to know nothing, but Jesus Christ and Him
crucified.
Let us not therefore be prevented from detaining you a few
moments longer, by the doctrine, that, however much the most perfect of the
species may have to glory of in the eye of his fellows, he has nothing to glory
of before God. The apostle affirms this of Abraham, a patriarch whose virtues
had canonized him in the hearts of all his descendants ; and who from the
heights of a very remote antiquity, still stands forth to the people of this
distant age, as the most venerably attired in the worth and piety and all the
primitive and sterling virtues of the older dispensation. As to his piety, of
this we have no document at all, till after the time when God met him - till
after that point in his history, which Paul assigns as the period of his
justification by faith - till after he walked in friendship with the God who
found him out an alien of nature ; and stretching forth to him the hand of
acceptance, shed a grace and a glory over the whole of his subsequent
pilgrimage in the world.
"Now if thou didst receive it, wherefore
shouldst thou glory as if thou hadst not received it ?" It is this question of
the apostle, which, among the varied graces and accomplishments of a Christian,
perpetuates his humility, as the garb and the accompanirnent of them all. "
Nevertheless not me, but the grace of God that is in me," is the great
principle of explanation, which applies to every virtue that springs and grows
and expands into luxuriance and beauty on the character of man, after his
conversion; and so keeps him humble amid all the heights of progressive
excellence to which he is conducted. Certain it is, that it is not till after
this period; that he acquires the right principle, or can make any right
advances in the path of godliness; and that, whatever he had antecedently -
whether of affection to parents, or of patriotic regard to country, or of mild
and winning affability to neighbourhood, or of upright duty in the walks either
of public or relative life to society around him, or of all that which calls
forth the voice of man to testifyin behalf of the virtues that are useful a a
and agreeable to man - certain it is, that with every human being, prior to
that great transition in his history which, in the face of all the ridicule
excited by the term, we denominate his conversion - God is not the Being whose
moral and judicial authority is practically recognized in any of these virtues,
and he has nothing to glory of before God.
It is thus we should hike to
convince the good man of this world of his wickedness, and to warn him that the
plaudits of the world's admiration here may be followed up by shame and
everlasting contempt hereafter. In this visible and earthly scene, we are
surrounded with human beings, all of whom are satisfied if they see in us of
their own likeness and, should we attain the average character of society, the
general and collective voice of society will suffer us to pass. Meanwhile, and
till God be pleased to manifest Himself, we see not God; and, not till the
revelation of His likeness is made to us, do we see our deficiency from that
image of unspotted holiness - to be restored to which is the great purpose of
the dispensation we sit under
And thus, in spiritual blindness and
spiritual insensibility, do the children of alienated nature spend their days -
lifting an unabashed front and bearing a confident pretension in society, even
as the patriarch Job challenged the accusation of his friends and protested
innocence and kindness and dignity before them; but who, when God Himself met
his awakened eye, and brought the overpowering lustre of His attributes to bear
upon him, said of Him whom he had only before heard of by the hearing of the
ear, that, now he saw Him with the seeing of the eye, he abhorred himself and
repented in dust and in ashes.
This is the sore evil under which
humanity labours. It is sunk in ungodliness, while blindness hinders the seeing
of it. The magnitude of the guilt is unfelt; and therefore does man persist in
a most treacherous complacency. The magnitude of the danger is unseen; and
therefore does man persist in a security most ruinous. There may be some
transient suspicion of a hurt, but a gentle alarm may be hushed by a gentle
application; and therefore the hurt, in the language of the prophet, is healed
but slightly. Peace when there is no peace forms the fatal lethargy of a world
lying in wickedness - a peace which we should like to break up, by setting in
prospect before you now the dread realities of a future world; but a peace,
which, with the vast majority we fear is never broken up, till these realities
have encompassed them by their presence - even the sound of the last trumpet,
and the appearance of celestial visitors in the sky, and all the elements in
commotion, and an innumerable multitude of new-risen men whose eyes have just
opened on a firmament which lowrs preternaturally over a world that is going to
expire - O! it is sad to think that pulpits should have no power of
disturbance, and the voice of those who fill them should die so impotently away
from the ears of men who in a few little years will be sealed to this great
catastrophe of our species - when tokens so portentous and preparations so
solemn as these will mark that day of decision, which closes the epoch of time
and ushers in an irrevocable eternity!
The second lesson which we
should like to urge upon you is, that this disease of nature, deadly and
virulent as it is, and that beyond the suspicion of those who arc touched by
it, is not beyond the remedy provided in the gospel. Ungodliness is the radical
and pervading ingredient of this disease; and it is here said of God that He
justifies the ungodly. The discharge is as ample as the debt; and the grant of
pardon in every way as broad and as long, as is the guilt which requires it.
The deed of amnesty is equivalent to the offence; and, foul in native and
spiritual character as the transgression is, there is a commensurate
righteousness which covers the whole deformity, and translates him whom it had
made utterly loathsome in the sight of God, into a condition of full favour and
acceptance before Him. Had justification been merely brought into contact with
some social iniquity, this were not enough to relieve the conscience of him,
who feels in himself the workings of a direct and spiritual iniquity against
God - who is burdened with a sense of his manifold idolatries against the love
of Him, who requires the heart as a willing and universal offering - and
perceives of himself that the creature is all his sufficiency; and that, grant
him peace and health and abundance in this world, he would be satisfied to quit
with God for ever, and to live in some secure and smiling region of atheism.
This is the crying sin with every enlightened conscience. It is the
iniquity of the heart that survives every outer reformation, and lurks in its
profound recesses under the guise and semblance of many outward plausibilities
- it is this, for which in the whole compass of nature, no healing water can be
found, either to wash away its guilt, or to wash away its pollution. It is a
sense of this which festers in the stricken heart of a sinner, and often keeps
by him and agonizes him for many a day, like an arrow sticking fast. And it is
not enough that justification be brought into contact with the sin of all our
social and all our relative violations. It must be made to reach the deadliest
element in our controversy with God, and be brought into contact, as it is in
our text, with the sin of ungodliness.
And, to complete the freeness of
the gospel. There arc many who keep at a distance from its overtures of mercy,
till they think they have felt enough and mourned enough over their need of
them. Now we have no such command over our sensibilities; and the most grievous
part of our disease is, that we are not sufficiently touched with the
impression of its soreness; and we ought not thus to wait the progress of our
emotions, while God is standing before us with a deed of justification, held
out to the ungodliest of us all. To give us an interest in the saying, that God
justifieth the ungodly, it is enough that we count it a faithful saying, and
that we count it worthy of all acceptation. It is very true, that we will not
count it a faithful saying, unless, from some cause or other, (and no cause
more likely than a desire to escape from the consequence of sin,) we have been
induced to attend to it. And neither will we count it worthy of all
acceptation, unless our convictions have led us to feel the need of a
righteousness, and the value of an interest therein. But if your concern about
your soul has been such, that you have been led to listen and that for your own
personal behoof, to the offer of the gospel - that is warrant enough for us to
explain to you the terms of it, and to crave your acceptance of them.
Whatever your present alienation, whatever the present hardness of your
heart under the sense of it, what ever there be within you to make out the
charge of ungodliness, and whatever to aggravate that charge in your wretched
apathy amid so much guilt and so much danger - here is God with a deed of
righteousness, by the possession of which you will be accepted as righteous
before Him; and which to obtain the possession of, you are not to work for as a
reward, but to accept by a simple act of dependence. It becomes yours by
believing; and while it is our office to deal out the doctrine of the gospel,
we do it with the assurance, that, wherever the belief of its truth may light,
it will not light wrong; but that, if the faith of this gospel be formed in the
bosom of any individual who now hears us, it will be followed up by a
fulfilment upon him of all its promises.
But thirdly, while the office
of a righteousness before God is thus brought down, so to speak, to the lowest
depth of human wickedness, and it is an offer by the acceptance of which all
the past is for given - it is also an offer by the acceptance of which all the
future is reformed. When Christ confers sight upon a blind man, he ceases to be
in darkness; and when a rich individual confers wealth upon a poor, he ceases
to be in poverty - and so, as surely, when justification is conferred upon the
ungodly, his ungodliness is done away. His godliness is not the ground upon
which the gift was awarded, any more than the sight of him who was blind is the
ground upon which it was communicated, or than the wealth of him who was poor
is the ground upon which it was bestowed. But just as sight and riches come out
of the latter gifts, so godliness comes out of the gift of justification; and
while works form in no way the consideration upon which the righteousness that
availeth is conferred upon a sinner, yet no sooner is this righteousness
granted than it will set him a-working. So that while we hold it a high
privilege, that we can say to the ungodhiest of you all, Here is the free and
unconditional grant of a justification for you, the validity of which you have
simply to rely upon. -the privilege rises inconceivably higher in our
estimation, that we can also say, how the unfailing fruit of such a reliance
will be a personal righteousness emerging out of the faith which worketh by
love, and which transforms into a new creature the man who truly entertains it.
Go To Lecture 14Go
back to Romans index