Examination of
Maurices Theological Essays
Extract from "Reason and
Revelation"
On this subject it is relevant to quote, as summing up the
argument, the closing paragraph of the Examination of Maurices
Theological Essays (p. 480), in which the controversy at issue between
him and his examiner is reduced to a single question: - That question, as
it seems to me, concerns the nature of the government of God. Is it a
government of law? Does God rule intelligent beings by a law? Certainly, I may
be told. Who doubts it? The government of God is a government of law, - of the
law of love. But I must be allowed again to ask, In what sense is it a
government of law? For the familiar use of the expression, laws of
nature, has introduced an ambiguity into this phrase. What is a
government of law, a government by law? If I am absolutely dependent upon a
being possessed of certain tastes, under the influence, let it be supposed, of
a particular ruling passion, - if he and I are inseparably bound together, so
that I must make up my mind to receive all my good from him, and find all my
good in him, such as he is; then, in his tastes, in his ruling passion, I have
a law, conformity to which is th condition of my wellbeing. Obviously, however,
ruling passion in him is a law to me, in precisely the same sense in which any
quality in matter is a law to me; in that sense and in no other. My intimate
connection with the material world makes conformity to the unchanging
principles, according to which its movementa. proceed, a condition of my
wellbeing as a creature endowed with a physical nature. My intimate connection
with the being or person with whom I am living, and am always to live, makes
conformity to the unchanging principles, or habit, or ruling passion according
to which being uniformly feels and acts, the condition of my wellbeing as a
being endowed with the capacity of feeling and acting as he does. Let his
ruling passion be pure charity or love. Then, in one sense, there is a law
of love is brought into contact with my will. The law of love is
unbending, and it has in it an element of wrath against the unlovely. My will
is perverse, apt to incline towards subjection to a usurping tyrant or an
intruding tempter, capable of almost infinite resistance. But the law of love
works steadily on. It unfolds and reveals itself, it embodies itself in action,
it is manifested wonderfully in redeeming and regenerating economy, and
ultimately one cannot see how it can fail to bring my will, and every
reasonable will, into accordance with itself. For any.thing I can perceive,
government by law in any other sense than this, is not recognized at all in the
theology of these Essays.
It is needless to add, that the whole
theology of those who are commonly considered orthodox and evangelical divines,
is based upon an entirely different conception both of government and of law.
According to them it is an administrative government that God exercises, - a
government embracing in it legislation, judicial procedure, calling to account,
awarding sentences. It is an authoritative law, with distinct sanctions annexed
to it, that God promulgates and enforces. This is what they understand when
they speak of God being a moral Ruler as well as a holy and loving Father. They
cannot rid themselves of the impression that both Scripture and conscience
attest the reality of such a government and such a law. It is under that
impression that they draw out from Scripture, to meet the anguish of
conscience, those views of the guilt of sin and its complete expiation, the
corruption of nature and its thorough renovation, - those views of pardon,
peace, reconciliation, reward, which they delight to urge upon all men in the
name of Him who hath no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the
wicked should turn unto him and live.
And it is under the same
impression that they think they find, in the essential freedom of the will of
man as a responsible agent, an explanation, on the one hand, of the possibility
of evil entering into the universe under the rule of a good and holy God; and
on the other hand also, a probable explanation of the impossibility of there
being any provision of mercy brought Within the reach of men, which does not
imply a provision also for the case of that mercy being neglected or
refused.
Home | Biography | Literature | Letters | Links | Photo-Wallet