DISRUPTION
WORTHIES
From the Book of that name.
IN the list of our Disruption Worthies, the place
belonging to Principal Candlish is altogether unique as well as eminently
illustrious. Dr Chalmers takes precedence, by the combination of considerable
seniority with the extraordinary character of a very original genius. But,
after deducting what is due to this remarkable exception, Dr Robert Smith
Candlish will appear in the pages of our ecclesiastical history as the chief
and wonderfully qualified instrument who was raised up by God's providence for
expounding the principles, directing the spirit, and organising the government
and system of the Free Church of Scotland.
His father having died
previously to his birth, he had the benefit in his mother of a strong character
watching over him in his youth. But he seems to have been largely indebted,
under God's guidance, to the secret workings of his own vigorous, quick and
impulsive, but deep and penetrating, mind. He had a full and regular Scotch
education adding the literary and philosophical classes of the University
during five sessions, he afterwards prosecuted studies in the Divinity Hall for
three full sessions till the month of December 1823, when he had the advantage
of varying the scene of his occupation by going to Eton as a private tutor.
Significant fruits of his continuance for three years in this position might be
discovered even in the brightest manifestations of his powers at subsequent
periods. And long before he shone forth as an accomplished leader of men, he
had very happily exhibited his familiarity with the best English writing. No
intelligent judge of literary acquirement could fail to perceive, in listening
to his preaching, the tokens of a cultivated intellect alive to the beauties of
Shakespeare and other English classics.
At what stage of his life he
first felt the full power of the gospel, and was stirred by zeal for the cause
of Jesus and for the salvation of souls, there may be no evidence to shew. But
whether the highest influence laid hold of his powerful nature at an earlier or
a later period, indications of conscientious devotion to his Master's work may
be found in his correspondence for some time before his ordination. While still
a probationer of the Established Church of Scotland, he had, as assistant, the
entire charge of two very different congregations in succession - the one in
Glasgow, from 1829 (the twenty-third year of his age) till 1831 ; and the other
in the country, at Bonhill, from 1831 till 1833. Thus, in addition to his
protracted course of education and tutorship, he had an extended experience of
ministerial work both in town and country before he was called to occupy what
was in many respects, in 1834, the most conspicuous pulpit in Scotland. Who can
tell what progress of thought or what spiritual growth went on in that lively,
clear-sighted and fervent soul, while the great ones of the earth and even the
approved guides of the Church had taken no note of him ?
Mr Martin, the
excellent and much loved person who immediately followed
Dr Andrew Thomson in the
pastorate of St George's, Edinburgh, was so quickly removed by death, that the
name of Dr Candlish must always stand out in a commanding light as the name of
the real successor to that extraordinary man in building effectively and
largely on the foundation which his energy and earnestness had laid. The
assistant at Bonhill had become in some measure known to the late Dr Welsh,
Professor of Church History, who afterwards, as Moderator, laid the Disruption
Protest on the table of the Assembly in 1843. That distinguished and consistent
man was a member of the congregation of St George's at the time of Mr Martin's
illness. Through him Lord Moncreiff and others heard of Mr Candlish, and thus
came his nomination to occupy a pulpit which he afterwards illustriously
adorned. At the very outset of his course in it, he exhibited so much greater
minuteness and subtlety of discussion than the hearers of Dr Thomson had been
accustomed to, that there was some division of opinion about him. But the
present writer remembers well that, in the view of Dr Thomson's experienced
admirers, such as Lord Moncreiff, Mr Donaldson, Mr John Thomson, Mr John Tod,
Mr Shank More, and others, members of session, the differences between his
style and that of the young preacher whom they now welcomed, were as nothing in
comparison with the manifest signs in the latter of uncommon mental power and
special capacity for effective speaking, both to the understanding and the
heart, along with independence and earnestness of spirit. Their judgment was
thoroughly justified by the result. He speedily commanded the attention and
regard of all classes in the congregation, and, as a preacher, gradually
acquired the reputation which has become so great and well known.
Having
been occupied only as an assistant during five years previously to the full
appreciation of his ministerial gifts and his ordination for the charge of St
George's, an equal number of years elapsed before his eminence in the pastoral
office was accompanied by the discovery and exercise of his unrivalled ability
for the management of affairs and the leadership of the General Assembly. He
took no prominent part even in the Presbytery of Edinburgh till 1839. In the
spring of that year the adverse judgment of the House of Lords in the first
Auchterarder Case was pronounced. Great anxiety was felt by the Evangelical
party on the question of having adequately qualified persons to take the lead
in the ensuing Assembly. Though the name of Mr Candlish was in the order of
rotation for the representation of his Presbytery, no such opinion had as yet
been formed of him as to relieve that anxiety. The character and superiority of
his eloquence appeared for the first time when he spoke in answer to Dr Muir,
and supported the motion of Dr Chalmers for maintaining the principle of
Non-intrusion in the continued exercise of spiritual independence. But the
brilliant displays which elevated him to the undisputed leadership of the
Non-intrusion party and of the Church, were made at the meetings of the
Assembly's Commission in the latter portion of 1839 and the beginning of 1840,
when that body was called to deal with the rebellion of the majority of the
Presbytery of Strathbogie against the authority of the Assembly. The position
thus acquired by him was maintained till 1873, the year in which he died. In
the Free Church Assembly of that year he was specially blessed as an instrument
of peace ; and though enfeebled much in bodily strength, shewed a large measure
of his former mental power.
From 1840, the enumeration of the services
rendered by Dr Candlish, first to the majority of the Established Church before
the Disruption, and subsequently to the Disruption Church herself, not only in
the prime of his life, but for the advantage of her action in his more advanced
age, would be to recount the history of Scottish ecclesiastical events for more
than thirty years. From the suspension of the seven ministers in the Presbytery
of Strathbogie to the final passing of the Act in 1873, by which, in connection
with a fresh Overture then agreed to, the object of Mutual Eligibility between
the Free Church and the United Presbyterian Church was attained, so as to
prevent disruption in the Free Church, this remarkable man made his influence
predominantly felt in the prospering, the safety, and the vigorous working of
his church. The confidence of an overwhelming majority never ceased to follow
him. The high qualities of an eminently Christian and, at the same time, of a
singularly master mind, were luminously evident in him along a particularly
chequered course of trial and success.
It was said at the commencement
of this sketch that he was a chief instrument for expounding the principles,
directing the spirit, and organizing the government and system of the Free
Church of Scotland. His exposition of her principles was given in its clearest
and most impressive manner, at dates previous to the actual escape of himself
and his associates from the harassment of the Erastian chains which in 1843
were threatening to encompass them. The principles specially concerned in that
memorable escape were at the time represented as two in number - the principle
of non-intrusion, and the principle of spiritual independence. His exposition
of the principle of non-intrusion began with the striking outburst of eloquence
already referred to, by which, replying to Dr Muir in 1839, he proclaimed the
necessity of giving to the members of congregations an absolute right to
prevent the settlement over them as pastors of persons whom they could not
conscientiously receive as such. Throughout the various negotiations,
consultations, and discussions which followed during the next four years, Dr
Candlish took a leading part in maintaining and guarding the ground thus taken
up by him at the outset. The integrity of her adherence to it was an essential
element in the liberty which his energy, more than that of any other man,
enabled the Church, by God's blessing, to achieve when she carried away her
standard to the hall at Canonmills.
The benefit of his acute,
perspicacious, and thoroughly comprehensive intellect, was still more felt and
enjoyed in his dealing with the great principle of spiritual independence. Not
to speak of his splendid assertion of ecclesiastical liberty, in his treatment
of the grave case in which the ministers of the Strathbogie Presbytery were
concerned, nor of the instances in which, from time to time after the
Disruption, he defended and enforced the Free Church view, it is well that
attention should be fixed on the lucid declarations which appear in his
speeches between the date of the judgment of the Court of Session in the
Stewarton case and the date of the meeting of Assembly thereafter. The masterly
manner in which he met the conceptions of the_majority of the court as tending
to the destruction of all religious liberty, produced a lasting effect upon the
convictions of multitudes of earnest people. Adverting to the imputation
brought against the Church, of claiming to be the sole judges of what is
spiritual and what is civil, he electrified his audience by the three following
declarations. He said, first of all, "Whoever may put forth this monstrous
claim to be sole judge of what is spiritual and civil, tramples under foot the
rights, spiritual and civil, of all mankind, and establishes a despotism
altogether intolerable." He said, secondly, " If this claim be put forth by a
Church, it necessarily follows that that Church is dragging under her
superintendence, to the exclusion of civil courts, all ecclesiastical persons,
and assuming an authority in all causes, civil as well as in those
ecclesiastical." He said, thirdly, " But if this amounts to a violation of
civil liberty when the claim is put forth by a court of Christ, is it less a
violation when put forth by a Court of Session ? If such a claim be admitted on
the part of civil authorities, they may crush under their foot every vestige of
religious liberty ; they may put an end to the free holding of Assemblies; they
may put an end to the free preaching of the gospel." These and other statements
of Dr Candlish were welcomed with great applause and sympathy. They had a chief
part in carrying to a largely prevailing extent the mind of the Scottish
religious population into a clear persuasion, that a principle which lawyers
and statesmen rejected as extravagant and dangerous, was nevertheless a sacred
principle not to be abandoned, and the only principle on which the scriptural
freedom of a Church could safely rest. The idea became fixed among multitudes
of carefully considering men, that no adjustment of ecclesiastical relations
could satisfy conscience which did not fix "that," to use the words of Dr
Candlish, "the Church should be fully entitled to determine for herself, and
for the regulation of her own conduct in spiritual matters, what falls under
her spiritual jurisdiction ; leaving the Court of Session to determine for
itself, and for its own guidance, in deciding civil questions, what falls
within its civil jurisdiction."
Dr Candlish not only expounded Free
Church principles in a felicitous manner ; he also had much to do with
directing the spirit of Free Church action. Besides the force of his
inspiriting addresses, imbued as they were with the influence of the gospel in
its highest tone, he gave a peculiar impulse at once by example, by
exhortation, and by his proposals, to a habit of personal disinterestedness and
self-sacrificing zeal in the various ecclesiastical movements of the
emancipated Church. The success of the new organization, and its continually
growing strength, even in the face of outward assaults and inward conflicts,
are due in an incalculable measure to the strength of the spiritual fire which
was thus cherished, by God's grace, in response to the endeavours of Dr
Candlish, and those who went along with him or followed him.
Dr Candlish
was the chief instrument in organising the government and system of the Free
Church of Scotland. He possessed a marvellous combination of high-reaching
thought so as to be always applying the most commanding principles, with a
capacity for sifting and arranging the most minute details. This combination,
accompanied as it was by a most unselfish disposition, produced in him one very
rare quality, the absence of which is often manifest in very excellent and
intelligent persons. He had so great a habit of putting himself in thought into
the place of other men, that he almost always saw things not only from his own
point of view, but also from theirs. Whether he were dealing with the minister
of a small country congregation, or with the office-bearers of a large one in
the Highlands, or with any party in a large town, or with the clerk of a
Presbytery, or with the clerk of the General Assembly, or with the convener of
a committee, he scarcely ever failed to shew that he appreciated the other
person's difficulties, making every allowance for the necessities and
obligations of his position. Hence arose the great and general confidence
placed in him. Thus, whatever faults he had were regarded by those who knew
him, and by great numbers of persons who had experience of his consideration
and tenderness, as well as of his ability and his painstaking and disinterested
labour, as nothing in comparison with his surpassing merits.
It is
astonishing how he was enabled, amid his incessant work for the Church during
more than thirty years, to maintain the character of a pastor and preacher of a
very high order, and to keep gathered round him an overflowing congregation of
intelligent and devoted men and women. His success, both in the pulpit and
among those to whom he ministered otherwise, went on increasing in place of
abating, while he gave so much of his vigour to the general and public cause.
At the same time he contributed various publications to theological literature,
which of themselves are sufficient to establish a high place for him among the
gifted servants of Christ. He was not a mere advocate of Free Church opinions.
His mind took a large grasp of Christian interests and objects throughout the
world, and he heartily sympathised with all sincere efforts for their promotion
by churches and denominations differing from his own.
Great as the loss
of him was to his congregation and the Free Church at large, those who had the
privilege of his personal friendship are, next to his own family, the greatest
mourners in thinking of the bereavement occasioned by his removal. That
friendship was indeed a treasure. He was very true and faithful. He was full of
loving-kindness and sympathy. He thought, in any contingency, of the interests
and prospects of others in the view of their comfort and usefulness, even
before they had begun to look at that contingency themselves. He entered
readily into their anxieties, and did his best to guide them. He cordially
reciprocated all confidence placed in him. He quickly forgot all unpleasant
occurrences, and dealt with the persons concerned as if those occurrences had
never been. To any one now called upon to take any measure of responsibility
with respect to Free Church affairs, the feeling is strongly brought home that
a channel of strength and goodness has been withdrawn, to which he formerly had
recourse with lively expectation and with continual satisfaction. H. W. M.
THE END
Home | Biography | Literature | Letters | Links | Photo-Wallet