Life of Dr. John Owen. Part Two
If Burnet's "Pastoral Care" and Baxter's "Reformed Pastor"
may be named as the guides and counsellors of the ministers of that age, this,
tractate might well have been placed beside them as the handbook of the people
will they have not equal respect unto all God's ordinances? If Burnet's
"Pastoral Care" and Baxter's "Reformed Pastor" may be named as the guides and
counsellors of the ministers of that age, this, tractate might well have been
placed beside them as the handbook of the people. We still trace the signs of
the busy pastor in his next publication, which is entitled, "The Principles of
the Doctrine of Christ Unfolded, in Two Short Catechisms;" the first being
intended for young persons, the second for adults, and as an aid to parents in
domestic instruction. We are reminded, as we look on the stalworth Puritan, who
is soon to mingle in the great theological discussions of the day, thus
preparing "milk for babes," of Johnson's admiring sentence on Isaac Watts:
"Providing instruction for all ages, from those who were lisping their first
lessons, to the enlightened readers of Malebranche and Locke."
During
these years of his labourious and unostentatious pastorals, the solid
reputation of Owen was extending, and on April 29, 1646, he was appointed to
preach before Parliament, on occasion of its monthly fast. The discourse is
founded on Acts 16:9, " A vision appeared to Paul in the night: there stood a
man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help
us;" and is written in a style of popular eloquence by no means characteristic
of the usual strain of Owen's writings. The thanks of the House were conveyed
to Owen by Mr Fenner and Sir Philip Wentworth, and the discourse commanded to
be printed. The evangelic zeal of the pastor of Fordham breaks forth, towards
the close, in behalf of those parts of the empire which were destitute of
religious instruction, and especially in behalf of his ancestral country,
Wales: "When manna fell in the wilderness from the hand of the Lord, every one
had an equal share. I would there were not now too great an inequality when
secondarily in the hand of man, whereby some have all, and others none; some
sheep daily picking the choice flowers of every pasture,-- others wandering
upon the barren mountains, without guide or food." The glowing terms in which
he dedicates his sermon to the Long Parliament, as "most deservedly celebrated
through the whole world, and to be held in everlasting remembrance by all the
inhabitants of this island," have drawn forth the disapprobation of some. But
what contemporary opinion has been more justified by the calm judgment of later
history? What English Parliament ever bore upon its roll such a list of
patriots, or surrounded the immunities of the people with such constitutional
guards? Even the grudging concession of Hume goes so far as to say that their
conduct, with one exception, was such as "to entitle them to praise from all
lovers of liberty."
Not long after this, Owen's pastoral connection with
Fordham was brought to a close. The "sequestered incumbent" whose place he had
occupied died, and the right of presenting to the living having in this way
reverted to the patron, it was given to another. The event became the occasion
of introducing him to a wider sphere. The people of Coggeshall, an important
market-town of Essex, about five miles distant, no sooner received the tidings
of his deprivation than they sent a pressing invitation to him to become their
minister,--an invitation which the patron, the Earl of Warwick, immediately
confirmed Unlike Fordham, this new charge had previously been diligently
cultivated by a succession of faithful ministers; so that his work was not so
much to lay the foundation as to build. He soon beheld himself surrounded by a
congregation of nearly two thousand people, whose general religious consistency
and Christian intelligence were a delight to his heart, and whose strong
attachment to him subsequent events gave them abundant opportunities of
testifying.
Contemporaneously with these outward changes in Owen's
position, considerable changes also took place in his opinions on church
government. His removal to Coggeshall is named as the period at which he
renounced Presbyters; and the order of his church there is field to have been
brought into a closer conformity with the Independent or Congregational model.
There were principles, however, retained by Owen, both on the subject of
the ruling elder and of synods,--as we shall have occasion to show in noticing
some of his later writings,--which prove that his Congregationalism was of a
somewhat modified character, and which a moderate Presbyterian of our own
times, though not vaunting as identical with his views, would yet hail as
evidence that the gulf between himself and the Congregationalist is not
impassable. But the Presbyterians of Owen's early days in general went much
farther than those of the present age; and we deem it not the least of his
honours that he refused to follow in their course. Not that we have any
sympathy with those terms of unqualified censure with which the Presbyterians
of that age have too often been characterized. During the period of their brief
supremacy, they accomplished much for England. In proportion as we value those
noble statements of doctrine, the Westminster Confession and Catechisms, must
we be grateful to the Presbyterians, who took so prominent and cordial a part
in those deliberations which produced them. Well-informed and candid men of
other religious parties have not been slow to admit that those districts of
England which were brought under a Presbyterian pastorate and polity, made
visible progress in Christian intelligence and piety; and many of those
measures which were adopted by them in opposition to Cromwell, and which have
often been ascribed to hostility to liberty, were, in fact, honest endeavours
on their part to restore a constitutional government. But the intolerant spirit
which animated them at this particular juncture is neither to be extenuated nor
denied.
Having recently risen to power, they had become dazzled by the
dream of an impracticable uniformity, and, as Baxter, himself a Presbyterian,
complains, had shown too great a readiness to invoke to their aid in realizing
this ambitious dream the arm of secular power. The endless diversity of opinion
which the growing liberty and the general ferment at the public mind had
occasioned was regarded by them as evidence of the dangers of unlimited
toleration, and they imagined that amid such discordant sounds truth must be
indistinguishable, and even perish from the earth. Owen's mind had, meanwhile,
far advanced beyond these narrow views, and risen above these imaginary fears.
He had boundless confidence in the vitality of truth,--strong convictions of
the power of its own spiritual weapons, and of the utter impotence of every
other: and while so many of those with whom he hitherto been associated saw
only, in the mingled light and darkness, the approach of night, he hailed in
them the hopeful twilight which was to grow into perfect day. In a "Country
essay for the practice of church government," prefixed to his sermon before
Parliament, he repeatedly condemns all enforced conformity and punishment of
heretical opinions by the sword. "Heresy," says he, "is a canker, but it is a
spiritual one; let it be prevented by spiritual means: cutting off men's heads
is no proper remedy for it." That Owen should have renounced Presbyters, in the
intolerant and repulsive form in which it was at this time presented to him, is
not to be wondered at; but that he recoiled equally far at every point from all
the essential and distinctive principles of that form of church government is a
statement which many have found it more difficult to believe. At the same time,
no reasonable doubt can be entertained that the government of Owen's church at
Coggeshall was decidedly Congregational; and if that church in any degree
corresponded with the counsels which Owen addressed to it in his next
publication, it must have been preeminently one of those to which Baxter
alludes in that honorable testimony, "I saw a commendable care of serious
holiness and discipline in most of the Independent churches." The publication
to which we refer is "Eshcol; or, Rules of Direction for the Walking of the
Saints in Fellowship according to the order of the Gospel, 1647." The rules are
arranged into two parts,--those which relate to the duty of members to their
pastors, and those which specify the duties of members to each other. They are
designed to recall men from debates about church order to the serious, humble
performance of those duties which grow out of their common fellowship in the
gospels. Amid its maxims of holy wisdom it would he impossible to discover
whether Owen was a Congregationalist or a Presbyterian.
"Eshcol" was the
work of Owen as a pastor; in the following year he was once more to appear as a
theologian and Christian polemic, in a work on which he had long been secretly
engaged,--"Salus Electorum, Sanguis Iesu; or, the Death of Death in the Death
of Christ." The great subject of this treatise is the nature and extent of the
death of Christ, with especial reference to the Arminian sentiments on the
latter subject. It is dedicated to the Earl of Warwick, the good patron who had
introduced Owen to Coggeshall, and warmly recommended by two Presbyterian
ministers as "pulling down the rotten house of Arminianism upon the head of
those Philistines who would uphold it." Owen himself makes no secret of having
devoted to it immense research and protracted meditations. He had given it to
the world after a more than seven-years serious inquiry, with a serious perusal
of all that the wit of man, in former or latter days, had published in
opposition to the truth. It is not without good reason therefore, that he
claims a serious perusal in return: "Reader, if thou art as many in this
pretending age, a sign or title gazer, and comest into books as Cato into the
theatre, to go out again,--thou hast had thy entertainment: farewell." The
characteristic excellencies of Owen's mind shine out in this work with great
lustre,--comprehension and elevation of view, which make him look at his
subject in its various relations and dependencies, united with the most
patiently minute examination of its individual parts,--intellectual strength,
that delights to clear its way through impeding sophistries and snares,--
soundness of judgment, often manifesting, even in his polemical writings, the
presence and power of a heavenly spirit, and "expressing itself in such pithy
and pregnant words of wisdom, that you both delight in the reading, and praise
God for the writer." Owen does not merely touch his subject, but travels
through it with the elephant's grave and solid step, if sometimes also with his
ungainly motion; and more than any other writer makes you feel, when he has
reached the end of his subject, that he has also exhausted it.
In those
parts of the present treatise in which he exhibits the glorious union and
cooperation of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, in the work of redemption, and
represents the death of Christ as part of the divine plan which infallibly
secures the bringing of many sons unto glory, he has shown a mastery of
argument and a familiarity with the subject-matter of revelation, that leave
even the kindred treatise of Witsius far behind. Many modern Calvinists have,
indeed, expressed a doubt whether, in thus establishing the truth, he has yet
established the whole truth; and whether his masterly treatise would not have
more completely exhibited the teaching of Scripture on the relations of the
death of Christ, had it shown that, in addition to its more special designs,
and in harmony with them, it gave such satisfaction to the divine justice as to
lay a broad and ample foundation for the universal calls of the Gospel. It is
quite true that the great object of the book is to prove that Christ died for
the elect only; and yet there are paragraphs in which Owen, in common with all
Calvinists worthy of the name who hold the same view, argues for the true
internal perfection and sufficiency of the sacrifice of Christ, as affording a
ground for the indiscriminate invitations of the Gospel, in terms as strong and
explicit as the most liberal Calvinist would care to use. This great work was
the occasion of much controversy; and it is worthy of especial notice that it
was the first production that turned towards Owen the keen eye of Richard
Baxter, and brought the two great Puritans at length to measure arms. Eventful
and anxious years were now passing over the land, in which the long struggle
between prerogative and popular right continued to be waged with various
success; and at length Owen beheld war brought almost to his door. The friends
of Charles, having suddenly risen in Essex, had seized on Colchester, and
imprisoned a committee of Parliament that had been sent into Essex to look
after their affairs. Lord Fairfax, the leader of the Parliament's forces, had
in consequence been sent to recover Colchester and deliver the committee, and
for nearly ten weeks maintained a strict siege before its walls. Coggeshall,
being not far distant, was chosen as the head quarters of the general; and
intercourse having been begun between him and Owen, it became the foundation of
a lasting friendship, which, we shall soon find, was not without important
fruits. At the close of the ten weeks' siege, of which Owen describes himself
as having been an "endangered spectator," he preached two sermons; the one to
the army at Colchester on a day of thanksgiving for its surrender, and the
other at Rumford to the Parliamentary committee on occasion of their
deliverance. These were afterwards published as one discourse on Hab. 1:l-9.
But in the course of a few months, Owen was called to officiate in
circumstances unspeakably more critical. Charles I had been brought to trial
before the High Court of Justice, on the charge of being a traitor, tyrant, and
murderer; and, in execution of its daring judgment, beheaded before the gates
of Whitehall. On the day following this awful transaction, Owen preached by
command before Parliament; and the manner in which he discharged this unsought
and perilous duty, it has been not unusual to represent as one of the most
vulnerable points in his public life. His sermon, which is entitled, "Righteous
Zeal Encouraged by Divine Protection," is founded on Jer. 15:l9,20, "I will
make thee unto this people a fenced brazen wall; and they shall fight against
thee, but they shall not prevail against thee: for I am with thee to save thee,
and to deliver thee, saith the Lord,"--a passage which obviously gave him ample
opportunity for commenting on recent events. It is remarkable, however, that
there is throughout a systematic and careful confining of himself to general
statements, the most explicit allusion to the event of which, doubtless, every
mind at the moment was full, being in that two edged sentence, "To those that
cry, give me a king, God can give him in his anger; and from those that cry,
Take him away, he can take him away in his wrath;" and the charge founded on
this constrained silence, from the days of Owen to our own, is that of selfish
and cowardly temporizing. Even one eminent Scottish historian, dazzled, we
presume, by the picture of his own Knox, with Bible in hand, addressing Mary,
and of other stern presbyters rebuking kings, imagines one of these to have
occupied the place of Owen, and with what fearless fidelity he would have
addressed those august commoners, "even though every hair of their heads had
been a spear pointed at his breast."
But is there not a considerable
amount of undue severity in all this? In all likelihood those who had demanded
this service of Owen blamed him for an opposite reason, and hoped that this
theologian of high renown and untainted reputation would, in the hour of their
extremity, have surrounded their daring act with something more than the
dubious sanction of his ominous silence. But to ascribe his silence to
cowardice, is to assume that he secretly regarded the destruction of Charles as
an indefensible act of crime. And was this necessarily Owen's judgment? It was
surely possible that, while believing that the party which had brought Charles
to the scaffold had violated the letter of the constitution, he may also have
believed that it was in righteous punishment of one whose whole career as a
monarch had been one long conspiracy against it, and who had aimed, by fourteen
years of force and perfidy, to establish despotism upon the ruins of popular
liberty. He may have thought that treason was as possible against the
constitution as against the crown, and to the full as criminal; and that where
a king rejected all government by law, he could no longer be entitled to the
shelter of irresponsibility. He may have looked upon the death of Charles as
the last resource of a long-tried patience,--the decision of the question, Who
shall perish? the one, or the million? We do not say that these were actually
Owen's sentiments, but it is well known that they were the thoughts of some of
the purest and loftiest minds of that earnest age; and if Owen even hesitated
on these points, on which it is well-known Milton believed, then silence was
demanded, not only by prudence, but by honesty, especially in a composition
which he himself describes at, "like Jonah's gourd, the production of a night."
Whatever opinion may be formed of Owen's conduct in the matter of the
sermon, there are few, we imagine, that will not look on the publication of his
"Discourse on Toleration," annexed to the sermon, and presented to the
Parliament along with it, as one of the most honourable facts in the public
life of this great Puritan. The leading design of this essay is to vindicate
the principle, that errors in religion are not punishable by the civil
magistrate, with the exception of such as in their own nature, not in some
men's apprehensions, disturb the order of society. To assert that this great
principle, which is the foundationstone of religious liberty, was in any sense
the discovery of Owen, or of that great party to which he belonged, is to
display a strange oblivion of the history of opinions. Even in the writings of
some of the earliest Reformers, such as Zwingle, the principle may be found
stated and vindicated with all the clearness and force with which Owen has
announced it; and Principal Robertson has satisfactorily proved, that the
Presbyterian church of Holland was the first among the churches of the
Reformation formally to avow the doctrine, and to embody and defend it in its
authoritative documents. Nor is it matter of mere conjecture, that it was on
the hospitable shores of Holland, and in the bosom of her church, that English
fugitives first learned the true principles of religious liberty, and bore them
back as a precious leaven to their own land. It is enough to say of Owen and
his party, that in their attachment to these principles they were greatly in
advance of their contemporaries; and that the singular praise was theirs, of
having been equally zealous for toleration when their party had risen to power,
as when they were a weak and persecuted sect. And when we consider the
auspicious juncture at which Owen gave forth his sentiments on this momentous
subject, his influence over that great religious party of which he was long the
chief ornament and ruling Spirit, as well as the deference shown to him by the
political leaders and patriots of the age, it is not too much to say, that when
the names of Jeremy Taylor and Milton, and Vane and Locke are mentioned, that
of John Owen must not be forgotten, as one of the most signal of those who
helped to fan and quicken, if not to kindle, in England, that flame which, "by
God's help, shall never go out;" who, casting abroad their thoughts on the
public mind when it was in a state of fusion and impressibility, became its
preceptor on the rights of conscience, and have contributed to make the
principles of religious freedom in England familiar, omnipresent, and
beneficent, as the light or the air.
On the 19th of April we find Owen
once more summoned to preach before Parliament, the chiefs of the army being
also present; on which occasion he preached his celebrated sermon, "On the
Shaking of Heaven and Earth," Heb.12:27. Oliver Cromwell was present, and
probably for the first time heard Owen preach. Ere the sermon was completed,
Cromwell had formed a resolution which the following day gave him an
opportunity of executing. Owen having called at the house of General Fairfax,
to pay his respects to him in remembrance of their recent intercourse at
Colchester, was informed by the servants that the general was so indisposed
that he had already declined to receive the visits of several persons of
quality. The pastor of Coggeshall, however, sent in his name; and while
waiting, Cromwell and many other officers entered the room. Owen's tall and
stately figure soon caught the eye of Cromwell as the person whom he had heard
preach with so much delight yesterday; and going up to him, he laid his hands
upon his shoulders, and said to him familiarly, "Sir, you are the person I must
be acquainted with." Owen modestly replied, "That will be much more to my
advantage than yours." To which Cromwell returned, "We shall soon see that;"
and taking Owen by the hand, led him into the garden, and made known to him his
intention to depart for Ireland, and his wish that Owen should accompany him as
chaplain, and also to aid him in investigating and setting in order the affairs
of the University of Dublin. To this unexpected proposal Owen naturally
objected the claims of his church at Coggeshall; but Cromwell reminding him
that he was about to take his younger brother, whom he dearly loved, as
standard-bearer in the same army, would not listen to a refusal. He even wrote
to the church at Coggeshall urging their consent; and when they showed
themselves even more averse to the separation than their pastor, Cromwell rose
from entreaties to commands; and Owen, with the advice of certain ministers
whom he consulted, was at length induced to make slow preparations for the
voyage.
In the interval between these arrangements and his departure for
Ireland, we discover Owen once more preaching before the officers of state and
the House of Commons, on occasion of the destruction of the Levellers; and
about the middle of August we find the army ready to embark for Ireland. On the
day before the embarkation it presented one of those characteristic pictures
which are almost without a parallel in the history of nations. The entire day
was devoted to fasting and prayer;-- three ministers in succession, among whom
we cannot doubt was Owen, solemnly invoked the divine protection and blessing;
after which Colonels Gough and Harrison, with Cromwell himself, expounded
certain pertinent passages of Scripture. No oath was heard throughout the whole
camp, the twelve thousand soldiers spending their leisure hours in reading
their Bibles, in the singing of psalms, and in religious conferences. Thus was
trained that amazing armament, to whom victory seemed entailed,--whose soldiers
combined the courage of the ancient Roman with the virtues of the private
citizen, and have been well described as "uniting the most rigid discipline
with the fiercest enthusiasm, and moving to victory with the precision of
machines, while burning with the wildest fanaticism of crusaders." There were
elements at work here that have seldom gone to the composition of armies. "Does
the reader look upon it all as madness? Madness lies close by, as madness does
to the highest wisdom in man's life always; but this is not mad! This dark
element, it is the mother of the lightnings and the splendours; it is very sure
this?"
It is no task of ours to follow the course of Cromwell in his rapid
and terrible campaign, in which he descended upon Ireland "like the hammer of
Thor," and by a few tremendous and almost exterminating strokes, as before the
walls of Drogheda, spread universal terror throughout the garrisons of Ireland,
saving more blood than if he had adopted a more feeble and hesitating course.
His policy in Ireland finds its explanation in two circumstances,--the
impression that he had come as the instrument of a just God to avenge the
innocent blood of more than a hundred thousand Protestants,--and the conviction
that, in repressing a rebellion which threatened the existence of the infant
Commonwealth, the "iron hand," though the least amiable, was the most merciful,
and would save the necessity of a wider though more prolonged vengeance. But
our business is with Owen, whom we find meanwhile employed within the friendly
walls of Dublin in preaching to "a numerous multitude of as thirsting people
after the gospel as ever he conversed with," investigating the condition of the
university, and devising measures for its extension and efficiency. His
preaching was "not in vain," while his representations to Parliament led to
measures which raised the university from its halfruinous condition, and
obtained for it some of its most valuable immunities. In the course of nine
months, Cromwell, whose career in Ireland had been that of the lightning
followed by the shower, terrific yet beneficent, returned to England to receive
the thanks of the Parliament and the people, and to be appointed
General-in-chief of the armies of the Commonwealth; and Owen, mourning over the
fact "that there was not one gospel preacher for every walled town in Ireland,"
was restored to his rejoicing flock at Coggeshall.
But the release which
he was to enjoy was short. Cromwell had scarcely returned from Ireland, when
the state of Scotland demanded his presence. That nation, which had begun the
resistance to the tyranny of the Stuarts, and to the worse tyranny of Rome, had
almost unanimously disapproved of the death of Charles, and now looked with
jealousy and hostility upon the government of the Commonwealth. They had
actually invited Charles from the midst of his debaucheries of Breda to become
their king; and, deceived by his signing of the Covenant, were now meditating
an attempt to restore him to his father's throne. In all this Cromwell saw, on
the part of the best of the Scottish people, an honest and misguided zeal,
which was aiming substantially at the same ends as himself; but he saw in it
not the less the most imminent danger to the liberty, religion, and morality of
England, and hastened to assert and establish in Scotland the authority of the
Commonwealth. Simultaneously with this, an order passed the Commons requiring
Joseph Carol and John Owen to attend on the Commander-general as ministers; and
Owen was thus a second time torn away from his pastoral plans and studious
toils to the society of camps, and the din and carnage of sieges and
battlefields. Cromwell's motives for thus surrounding himself with the great
preachers of his age have been variously represented, according to the general
theory that has been formed of his character. Believing as we do in his
religious sincerity, we cannot doubt that he felt, like other religious men,
the powerful attraction of their intercourse. There was sound policy, besides,
in seeking by this means to convince an age remarkable for its religious
earnestness that he enjoyed the confidence and friendship of the chiefs of the
religious world; and hence we find him at a later period securing the presence
of John Howe at Whitehall, and aiming by repeated efforts to subdue the jealous
penetration of Baxter. This latter motive, we cannot doubt, had its own
influence in inducing him to take Carol and Owen with him to Scotland; and it
is very probable, moreover, that, with all his passion for theological
polemics, he foresaw that, in his anticipated discussions with the Scottish
clergy, he would be all the better of these Puritan chiefs to help him at times
in untying the Gordian knots which they were sure to present to him.
We are
able to trace but a few of the steps of Owen in Scotland. He appears to have
joined Cromwell at Berwick, where he preached from the text, Isa. 56:7, "For
mine house shall be called an hour of prayer for all people;" and, as we
conclude from a letter of Cromwell's, assisted, with "some other godly
ministers," in drawing up a reply to the Declaration of the General Assembly,
which had already been sent to Cromwell ere he could cross the borders. We next
find him writing from Musselburgh to Lisle, one of the commissioners of the
Great Seal, describing a skirmish between some of Cromwell's troops and those
of "cautious" Leslie. Next, the battle of Dunbar has been fought. Cromwell is
in possession of Edinburgh, but the castle still holds out against him, and the
ministers of the city have sought protection within its walls. The pulpits of
Edinburgh are consequently in the hands of Cromwell's preachers. Owen preached
repeatedly in old St. Giles', and is listened to at first with wonder and
jealousy, which gradually melt into kindlier feelings, as the multitude trace
in his words a sweet savour of Christ. It is the opinion of many that Owen's
hand is visible in the letters which passed between Cromwell and the governor
of Edinburgh castle, on the offer of the Lord General to allow the ministers to
come out and occupy their pulpits on the Sabbathday; when, on their somewhat
suspicious and sulky refusal, Cromwell addressed them in that celebrated letter
of which Carlyle sage, that the Scotch clergy never got such a reprimand since
they first took ordination." Undoubtedly there are striking resemblances to
Owen's turn of thoughts especially in the paper of "Queries," which abounds in
"lumbering sentences with noble meanings" We next follow him with Cromwell to
Glasgow, where Zachary Boyd thunders against the Lord-General in the old
cathedral, and Cromwell listens with calm forbearance, and where a discussion
takes place between Owen and the Scottish ministers, of which the following
anecdote is told:--A young Scottish minister, named Hugh Binning, not yet
twenty-six years of age, so managed the dispute as to confound Owen and the
other English divines. Oliver, surprised and half-pleased, inquired, after the
meeting was over, who this bold young man was; and being told that his name was
Binning,-- "He has bound, well indeed," said he; "but,"laying his hand on his
sword, "this will loose all again." The discussion, with Binning's victory, is
not improbable; but the bad pun and the braggart threat are not like Oliver,
and may safely be consigned to those other "anecdotes of Cromwell at Glasgow,"
of which Carlyle says, that "they are not to be repeated anywhere except in the
nursery."
But long ere Cromwell's campaign in Scotland was over, and that
last battle, in which he gained "Worcester's laureate wreath," had been fought,
which drove Charles back to Breda, and reduced Scotland under the generous sway
of the commonwealth, Owen had been permitted to return to his books and to his
quiet pastorals in Essex. It was only a short breathing-time, however, before
his connection with Coggeshall was loosed for ever. One morning he read, to his
surprise, in the newspapers of the day, the following order:--"On the 18th
March l651, the House, taking into consideration the worth and usefulness of
John Owen, M.A., of Queen's College, ordered that he be settled in the deanery
of Christ Church, in room of Dr Reynolds." A letter soon after followed this
from the principal students of Christ Church, expressing their great
satisfaction at the appointment. Cromwell before this had been chosen
Chancellor of Oxford. And on the 9th of September of the following year,
letters from Cromwell nominated Owen vice-chancellor of the university, and
thus placed him at the head of that great and ancient seat of learning from
which we have seen him, tell years before, walk forth an exile for conscience'
sake.
3 His Vice-Chancellorship
The office of dean of Christ Church
involved in it the duty of presiding at all the meetings of the college, and
delivering lectures in divinity; while that of vice-chancellor virtually
committed to the hands of Owen the general government of the university. A
charge of inconsistency has sometimes been brought against him, as an
Independent, for accepting such offices, especially that of dean; and even some
sentences of Milton have been adduced to give sanction to the complaint. But
the whole charge proceeds on a mistake. It should be remembered that the
University of Oxford during the Commonwealth shared in those changes which
befell so many other institutions, and had ceased to be a mere appendage and
buttress of Episcopacy, and that the office as held by Owen was separated from
its ecclesiastical functions, and retained nothing, in fact, of Episcopacy
except the name. It is quite true that the emoluments of the beanery were still
drawn from the same sources as at an earlier period; but Owen, in common with
many of the Independents and all the Presbyterians of his times, was not in
principle opposed to the support of the teachers of religion by national funds.
His scruples in accepting office in Oxford, and especially in consenting
to be raised to the high position of vice-chancellor, arose from other causes;
and it needed all the authority of Cromwell, and all the influence of the
senate, completely to overcome them. It required him to do violence to some of
his best affections and strongest predilections to tear himself away from the
studious days and the happy pastorate of Coggeshall; and perhaps it demanded a
higher pitch of resolution still to undertake the government of a university
which had been brought to the very brink of ruin by the civil wars, and from
which, during the intervening years, it had very partially recovered. During
those years of commotion, learning had almost been forgotten for arms; and
Oxford, throwing itself with a more than chivalrous loyalty into the cause of
Charles, had drained its treasury, and even melted its plate, in order to
retrieve his waning fortunes. The consequence had been, that at the end of the
civil war, when the cause of the Parliament triumphed, many of its halls and
colleges were closed; others of them had been converted into magazines for
stores and barracks for soldiers; the studious habits of its youth had been
completely disturbed, and the university burdened with a debt of almost
hopeless magnitude. Some of the worst of these evils still remained,--others of
them were only partially diminished; and when we add to this the spirit of
destructive Vandalism with which a noisy party began to regard those ancient
seats of learning, the licentiousness and insubordination which the students
had borrowed from the armies of the Royalists, as well as the jealousy with
which Owen was regarded by the secret friends of Episcopacy, and by
Presbyterians who had been displaced by Cromwell from high positions in order
to give place to Independents, it is easy to see that it required no common
courage to seize the helm at such a moment, to grapple with such varied and
formidable difficulties, and to reduce such discordant elements to peace. Such
was the work to which Owen now betook himself.
It is only too evident that
even at the present day it requires, in the case of many, something like a
mental effort against early prejudice, to conceive of this Puritan pastor
occupying the lofty eminence to which he was now raised with a suitable amount
of dignity and grace. Not only the author of "Hudibras," but even Clarendon and
Hume, have written of the Puritans in the style of caricature, and cleverly
confounding them under a common name with ignorant anal extravagant sectaries
whom the Puritans all along condemned and disowned, have too long succeeded in
representing the popular type of the Puritans as that of men of affected
sanctity, pedantic and piebald dialect, sour temper, and unpolished manner.
Those who indulge these ignorant mistake forget that if the Puritan preachers
were thus utterly deficient in matters of taste and refinement, they had
received their training at Oxford and Cambridge, and that the reflection must,
therefore, in all fairness, be extended to those seminaries. They forget,
moreover, as has been well remarked, that "it is more reasonable, and certainly
much more generous, to form our judgment with regard to religious parties from
the men among them who make their bequests to posterity, than from such as
constitute the weakness of a body rather than its strength, and who die, as a
matter of course, in the obscurity in which they have lived."
But it is
remarkable, that all the leading men among the Puritan clergy were such as,
even in the matter of external grace and polish, might have stood before kings.
The native majesty of John Howe, refined by intercourse with families of noble
birth, and his radiant countenance, as if formed "meliore luto", linger even in
his portraits Philip Henry, the playmate of pincer, bore with him into his
country parish that "unbought grace of life," which, in spite of his sterner
qualities, attracted towards him the most polished families of his
neighbourhood. Richard Baxter was the chosen associate of Sir Matthew Hale;
and, contrary even (continued in part 3...)
Home | Links | Photos | Literature | Biography