SIR ROBERT ANDERSON
Secret Service
Theologian
THE WAY
CHAPTER V
THE
SOBER LIFE
THE Bible, on its human side, is an Eastern book,
abounding in imagery and figure; and when we are told that grace teaches us,
the language, of course, is figurative. Whether we live under law or under
grace, God is the teacher. But the passage emphasises the truth that it is on
the principle of grace that He trains us, not of law. And these two principles
are wholly incompatible. Both are good and right, but they are inconsistent.
The essential characteristic of law is the assertion of rights; the essential
characteristic of grace is the giving up of rights. "He gave Himself for us,
that He might redeem us." This is the great manifestation of grace - the
self-sacrifice of the Son of God.
And it is on this principle that He
deals with us as now redeemed. It is a thorough paradox to a carnal man; but
the philosophy of the heart runs deeper than that of the head. An illustration
may be useful to mark the contrast between the two principles. "Thou shalt not
steal" was the command that pealed forth from Sinai; and a curse followed upon
transgression. "Let him that stole steal no more" is the kindred command of
grace. And now mark the sequel: "But rather let him labour, working with his
hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth."
Law forbids our taking what is anothers; grace goes further, and enjoins
our giving up what is our own. And so, through all the practical teaching of
the Epistle to the Ephesians, the warnings, even against sins of the grossest
kind, are based upon blessings freely given, or upon Divine relationships
freely formed.
"The grace of God trains us." In three other passages of the
New Testament this same word is used of Gods dealings with His people,
and in these it is rightly rendered chasten. "As many as I love I rebuke and
chasten," is the Lords word to Laodicea. And in the solemn warning
against unworthily partaking of the Lords Supper, the Apostle writes: "We
are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world." Law
would condemn; grace chastens. And the other passage - Hebrews xii.- marks the
distinction still more clearly. The fifth verse takes up the very words of the
warning to Laodicea: "Despise not the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when
thou art rebuked of Him."
And mark the ground on which the chastening
comes. It is not based upon sin committed, but upon the relationship in which
the sinner stands to God. "For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth." "What son
is he whom the Father chasteneth not?" But the difference does not end here.
Punishment, strictly so called, has relation to the past; chastening to the
future. Punishment is imposed because of sin committed; chastening is inflicted
with a view to the good of him who is the subject of it. He chastens us "for
our profit, that we might be partakers of His holiness."
The spirit of
legality that is indigenous to our hearts has no more common or subtle phase
than that of regarding chastisement as necessarily a punishment for sin. And
the teaching of the twelfth chapter of Hebrews, the Divine antidote for this
error, is but little understood. Indeed, our beliefs in this respect are but
the old doctrine of Eliphaz the Ternanite: "Who ever perished being innocent?
or where were the righteous cut off?" That one who lay crushed and desolate
beneath so terrible a storm of seemingly unpitying judgments could be "a
perfect and upright man that feared God and eschewed evil," was a phenomenon
entirely beyond the theology of the Temanite; and so he and his companions only
forced Job back upon the assertion of his own integrity, and drove him still
further from the God who was seeking thus to make him "partaker of His
holiness." And in the end the "comforters" of Job had to seek the prayers of
Job to save them from the wrath their words had kindled.
Grace
teaches us. The Christian course is a discipline. And the result is a sober,
righteous, and godly life on earth, with heart and eye fixed upon a blessed
hope above it and beyond it. "Soberly, righteously, and godly": these words
represent the threefold aspect of life - to a mans own spirit, to his
neighbour, and to God. And it is certain that these qualities are not
characteristic of the age we live in. Sobriety - where is it to be found in
this age of display, and hurry, and greed?
Just as a nations commerce
may be estimated by its coinage, so its thoughts may be judged by its language;
and this word "sober" has so long been run in a special and narrow groove that
now it almost refuses to expand to the thought that is here intended. And if
the word be wanting, we may be sure the quality it expresses has grown rare.
Elsewhere in this epistle this same word is rendered, in our version, "sober,"
"temperate," and "discreet"; and it embraces all this, and more.
Etymologically, it means possessed of a sound mind; and this idea always clings
to it. It implies a habit of mind opposed to extremes, and most of all to
levity. He who has been trained in the school of grace is marked by soundness
of judgment in all things. Sobriety should characterise the Christian, not only
in his conduct and circumstances, but in his language and his thoughts. And we
must not suppose that spiritual life is unaffected by the world without.
Practical Christianity is always leavened by the prevailing influences of the
time. Because of the national vices of the Cretans, the flock among whom Titus
ministered needed sharp rebuke. They were a mendacious, carnal, avaricious
race; hence the weighty precepts of the Epistle. This word "soberly," and its
kindred adjectives and verbs and nouns, are used but sixteen times in the New
Testament, and six of these are found in this brief letter. And though it may
be disputed whether the special Cretan vices mark our own society to-day, no
one will question that insobriety is specially characteristic of this
much-lauded age of ours. Nor is this true only of "the City." The baneful
influences which surround us, the haste and rivalry which mark our commercial
life, have invaded social, and even family life. What is said of the wicked
seems true of all together now - they are "like the troubled sea when it cannot
rest." Life is becoming a scramble. And Christian life is leavened by the evil
influence. Many an earnest worker might take up the sad lament, "They made me
keeper of the vineyards, but mine own vineyard have I not kept."
And such
may need the discipline of the Fathers house. But this must never be
allowed to obscure the truth of the believers security in Christ. "Him
that cometh unto Me," the Lord declares, "I will in no wise cast out." These
words are generally read as a "Gospel message." But such is not their purpose.
It is not that He never refuses to receive a repentant sinner, but that He
never expels a sinner whom He has thus received. Most true it is that He never
shuts the door against any one who comes to Him. But what He tells us here is
that no one whom He once has welcomed shall ever be put outside the door again.
Even if the words themselves were not so clear, the context would make this
plain. For He goes on to say, it is the Fathers will that not one of
those who come to Him shall be lost. And He adds, "I will raise him up at the
last day."
But this only serves to bring into greater prominence the need
of chastening. And "the chastening of the Lord" may explain what sometimes
seems capricious and even harsh in His dealings with His people. For are we not
perplexed and distressed at times, when the most earnest, and seemingly the
most useful, Christians are laid aside or called away? As seen by us," the
world to come" stands apart from "this present world." But it is not so with
God. And if our view included both worlds, Divine dealings which now seem
strange or harsh would appear as proofs of His wisdom and His love.
(Footnote - Hebrews x. 26 - 29, is misused to check "boldness," whereas its
purpose, as expressed in verse 35 (cf verse 19), is "Cast not away therefore
your boldness." As Alford writes, "It is the sin of apostasy from Christ back
to the state which preceded the reception of Christ, viz. Judaism. This is the
ground sin of all other sins. . . . It is not of an act, or any number of acts,
of sin, that the writer is speaking, which might be repented of and blotted
out; but of a state of sin in which a man is found when that day shall come."
And Heb. vi. 4-8 is to be explained in the same way, as the rest of that
chapter so clearly proves.)
What an example of this we find in the case
of one who is perhaps the grandest figure on the stage of Old Testament story.
Turning away from the treasures of Egypt, and all the power and pomp of the
throne of the Pharaohs, Moses threw in his lot with the despised and suffering
people of God. A stiff-necked and rebellious people they were; but he bore with
them, interceding for them when they sinned, and guiding and training them day
by day, during all their wilderness wanderings, until they reached the land of
promise. And yet for one hasty act of unfaithfulness, into which he was
betrayed when provoked beyond endurance, he was refused the prize of his whole
lifes work. What relentlessness and severity was this! But "judge nothing
before the time." The vision of "the holy mount" reveals to us that Moses was
singled out for extraordinary privilege and blessedness and glory. And thus we
see "the end of the Lord, that the Lord is very pitiful and of tender mercy."
CHAPTER
VI
THE RIGHTEOUS LIFE
IT is a common error to read the Old Testament as though
the blessings promised to the righteous were now the birthright of the
justified. True it is that in the present economy prominence is given to what
is spiritual - to the heart as distinguished from the outward life, whereas the
converse of this was necessarily characteristic of a dispensation of law. But
this only serves to prove more clearly that "the righteous" of the Psalms are
those who are practically upright. Grace has not changed the character of God,
nor yet the principles of His moral government. "Trust in the Lord, and do
good," is not an obsolete precept, inconsistent with grace; it is precisely
what grace teaches.
We seem in danger of supposing that "believers" have
access to God in spiritual things, and a right to expect blessing in temporal
things, without regard to the character of their life. Grace brings life
eternal to the drunkard or the thief; but the one does not celebrate the event
by a carouse, nor does the other steal the watch of the evangelist who has
ministered the Gospel to him. And why not? Their natural instincts would prompt
them to it. Yes, but the same grace which brings them life, teaches them. And
eternal life is not like a railway-ticket, or a trinket, that a man may lose if
he have a bad pocket, or fall in with bad company. If they have been saved,
they have repented and have been born again.
It is not that the one has
reckoned up the bottles he has drunk, and the other the pockets he has emptied,
and that they have mourned and wept at the retrospect. The repentance of the
Gospel is far deeper than repentance for sins, which is the lowest type of
repentance. Nor is it a change of conduct merely, but a change of mind. It is
not that a mans acts are different, but that he himself is different. The
drunkard may sit before his empty bottles, and cry, in bitterness of soul,
"Forgive my sins," and yet turn to his drink again before the week is over. The
very prayer, moreover, often contains the implied assertion that a man could do
better if he tried; and that he will do better if only the past be forgiven.
But grace goes deeper far than this. Law bids a man look back upon his life,
and plead, "Forgive my sins"; but grace teaches him to look within, and to cry,
with a heart laid bare before a holy and righteous God, "Be merciful to ME the
sinner." A holy God can have fellowship with such a man; and a righteous God
can crown him with blessings. But grace does not suspend the action of the
principles on which God governs the world; and the sinner, though thus blessed
and saved, may suffer, all his days on earth, the consequences of his sins. It
would betray strange ignorance, alike of doctrine and of fact, to quote
Davids words, "I have not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed
begging bread," and to argue that there can be no Christians in the workhouse,
and no children of Christians on the streets.
Not that adversity is proof
of sin. It may, as in the case of Job, be proof of special dealing from God, to
lead to special blessing. Indeed the thirty-seventh Psalm, above quoted, is
pervaded by this thought. But the great public principle of God's dealings with
men is that the upright prosper. Rogues may sometimes become millionaires, but
it is proverbial that ill- gotten wealth is fleeting. And, moreover, even in
this life, a man's balance at the banker's is not the only, nor even the
truest, test of prosperity. The rule is that integrity reaps its reward. If a
Christian grocer be less righteous in his dealings than his atheist rival next
door, God will not turn men's hearts to buy his tea. On the contrary, the man
will probably lose his customers and become bankrupt; and his rival will
probably prosper. And the result will only prove that the God whom the atheist
denies is a righteous God.
But it will be urged, "It is not God who does
this; it is merely the ordinary course of things." Here is atheism with a
vengeance! "The ordinary course of things" means just the ordinary course of
God's moral government of the world, and that is that righteousness prospers.
It is not always so, as we have seen; but it is the rule. If a man walks over a
precipice, God does not interfere, either to save or to destroy him. But the
catastrophe which follows is the result of natural laws which God has ordained.
The laws of Nature are so seldom suspended that when the phenomenon occurs we
describe it as a miracle. The laws of Providence, on the other hand, have many
a disturbance, many an exception. But yet both have been ordained by the same
God.
And these principles of Gods moral government display his
character. "The righteous Lord loveth righteousness." "What fellowship hath
righteousness with unrighteousness ? " If Christian men of business descend to
the common tricks of trade, will God accept them as his servants? Or will their
prayers avail? "The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much":
not a justified man merely, but a righteous man. The servants of Crete were
exhorted to "adorn the doctrine of God." And how could such adorn it? Why, by
obedience to their masters, and diligence in their work, and, as the Catechism
says, by keeping their hands from picking and stealing, and their tongues from
evil speaking - "not gainsaying, not purloining, but showing all good
fidelity." That their heathen masters, marking their conduct - watching them
through the keyhole, perhaps, when alone in the room, with the cupboard open -
might find that their lives were not governed by outward restraints, but by a
secret principle of good within, and thus learn to praise the doctrine which
could produce such results. They thus adorned the doctrine. It was not that the
servant was valued because of his profession, but that his creed was valued
because of his practice. And praise will not be earned as cheaply in Christian
England as it was in heathen Crete. The standard of public morality is higher;
and keeping clear of the policeman will not avail to adorn the Gospel. It is
not that the clerk does not forge cheques, but that he shows high Christian
principle in husbanding the time his employer pays him for. It is not that the
shopman does not rob the till, but that no reward or prospect of advancement
will induce him to call bad good, or to trick a customer. It is not that the
Christian groom does not steal the oats, but that his masters horses are
the best cared for in the parish. It is not that the Christian working-man does
not scamp his work, but that he risks persecution and loss by insisting, in
violation of trade-union rules, on working, not as a men-pleaser, but "with
good will as to the Lord." In a word, one and all, their righteousness exceeds
the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees; for it is only by "showing all
good fidelity" in things in which others fail, that the child of grace can be
distinguished.
This is not truth for one class only; it is truth for all.
It is the teaching of the Sermon on the Mount: "Let your light so shine before
men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in
heaven." And how many a humble and dreary lot would be ennobled and gladdened
if life were thus lived out to God, and even menial acts were done as to the
Lord!
The righteous living which grace enjoins is far more than the absence
of dishonesty. "Owe no man anything" is a precept which cannot be fulfilled by
a cheque-book or a purse of sovereigns. Grace is as ready to observe the rights
of others, as to relinquish its own. It has nothing in common with socialism.
But in our day the baneful principles of the Commune, which are leavening
society, are perverting even the doctrine of Christ. The Lord of glory calls us
"Brethren," "Friends"; the heart that grace has taught responds, "Master,"
"Lord." And so also in all the relationships of common life. Grace exacts
homage from none, but is eager to render it wherever it is due. The peer will
claim the peasant as his brother; the peasant will reciprocate by paying all
the deference which rank demands, especially when joined with worth and
godliness. The same grace which teaches a man to pay money to whom money is
due, teaches him, too, to "render to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is
due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour."
Righteous living implies a careful observance of every relationship, and a
careful discharge of every obligation. And if Christians do not take heed to
these things, when the present wave of blessing begins to ebb, and the world,
cold-hearted but clear-headed, comes to take stock of the results, a reaction
will set in against the loud profession of the day, and the worthy Name by
which we are called will be blasphemed. This is not in keeping with the spirit
of the age. But it pertains to "the things which befit wholesome teaching:"
teaching which is little known in days when even the sublime precepts of the
Sermon on the Mount are perverted to pander to a mawkishly unwholesome
socialism, by which even true-hearted Christians are betrayed into conduct that
is utterly un-Christian.
(A friend of mine who began his business life in
the office of Lord - , asked me once whether I thought he was justified as a
Christian in raising his hat when he met his lordship. I answered, of course,
that to be a Christian was higher than to be a gentleman, and that he was not
even a gentleman if he omitted to do it.)
CHAPTER
SEVEN
Literature | Photos | Links | Home